Current:Home > ScamsTexas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status -ForexStream
Texas, other GOP-led states sue over program to give immigrant spouses of US citizens legal status
View
Date:2025-04-18 18:05:49
Sixteen Republican-led states are suing to end a federal program that could potentially give nearly half a million immigrants without legal status who are married to U.S. citizens a path to citizenship.
The coalition filed suit Friday to halt the program launched by President Joe Biden in June, saying in court filings that the Biden administration bypassed Congress to create a pathway to citizenship for “blatant political purposes.”
“This action incentivizes illegal immigration and will irreparably harm the Plaintiff states,” the suit says.
Under the policy, which started taking applications Monday, many spouses without legal status can apply for something called “parole in place,” offering permission to stay in the U.S., apply for a green card and eventually get on a path to citizenship.
But the program has been particularly contentious in an election year where immigration is one of the biggest issues, with many Republicans attacking the policy and contending it is essentially a form of amnesty for people who broke the law.
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement Friday that the plan “violates the Constitution and actively worsens the illegal immigration disaster that is hurting Texas and our country.”
The suit filed against the Department of Homeland Security, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas and other Biden administration officials accuses the agency of attempting to parole spouses “en masse,” which the states contend is an abuse of power.
The Department of Homeland Security and the White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press.
The bipartisan immigration and criminal justice organization FWD.us noted the timing of the lawsuit — as Kamala Harris accepted the Democratic nomination for president — and said the program is in compliance with the law.
“The only motivation behind this lawsuit is the cruelty of tearing families apart and the crass politics of hoping a judge might do the bidding of the anti-immigrant movement,” the organization said in a statement.
To be eligible for the program, immigrants must have lived continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, not pose a security threat or have a disqualifying criminal history, and have been married to a citizen by June 17 — the day before the program was announced.
They must pay a $580 fee to apply and fill out a lengthy application, including an explanation of why they deserve humanitarian parole and a long list of supporting documents proving how long they have been in the country.
They apply to the Department of Homeland Security, and if approved, have three years to seek permanent residency. During that period, they can get work authorization. The administration estimates about 500,000 people could be eligible, plus about 50,000 of their children.
Before this program, it was complicated for people who were in the U.S. illegally to get a green card after marrying an American citizen. They can be required to return to their home country — often for years — and they always face the risk they may not be allowed back in.
veryGood! (86223)
Related
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- From Elvis to Lisa Marie Presley, Inside the Shocking Pileup of Tragedy in One Iconic Family
- Tom Holland Addresses Zendaya Breakup Rumors
- The Australian Open and what to know: Earlier start. Netflix curse? Osaka’s back. Nadal’s not
- Jorge Ramos reveals his final day with 'Noticiero Univision': 'It's been quite a ride'
- The Supreme Court will decide whether local anti-homeless laws are ‘cruel and unusual’
- New test of water in Mississippi capital negative for E. coli bacteria, city water manager says
- J.Crew Has Deals on Everything, Score Up to 70% Off Classic & Trendy Styles
- Realtor group picks top 10 housing hot spots for 2025: Did your city make the list?
- Rapper G Herbo sentenced to 3 years probation in credit card fraud scheme
Ranking
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- A 4th person has died after fiery crash near western New York concert, but motive remains a mystery
- Demi Moore Shares Favorite Part of Being Grandma to Rumer Willis' Daughter Louetta
- American Petroleum Institute Plans Election-Year Blitz in the Face of Climate Policy Pressure
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- Help wanted: Bills offer fans $20 an hour to shovel snow ahead of playoff game vs. Steelers
- Google layoffs 2024: Hundreds of employees on hardware, engineering teams lose jobs
- 3 Palestinians killed by Israeli army after they attack in West Bank settlement
Recommendation
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
Arizona governor proposes overhaul of school voucher program
'Frankly astonished': 2023 was significantly hotter than any other year on record
Buffalo shooter who killed 10 at Tops supermarket to face death penalty in federal case
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
South Africa’s ruling party marks its 112th anniversary ahead of a tough election year
Democratic lawmakers in New Mexico take aim at gun violence, panhandling, retail crime and hazing
Italy’s justice minister nixes extradition of priest sought by Argentina in murder-torture cases