Current:Home > MarketsKansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds -ForexStream
Kansas won’t force providers to ask patients why they want abortions while a lawsuit proceeds
View
Date:2025-04-15 23:24:41
TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — Kansas isn’t enforcing a new law requiring abortion providers to ask patients why they want to terminate their pregnancies, as a legal challenge against that rule and other older requirements makes its way through the courts.
Attorneys for the state and for providers challenging the new law along with other requirements announced a deal Thursday. In return for not enforcing the law, the state will get another four months to develop its defense of the challenged restrictions ahead of a trial now delayed until late June 2025. The agreement was announced during a Zoom hearing in Johnson County District Court in the Kansas City area.
Kansas doesn’t ban most abortions until the 22nd week of pregnancy. Its clinics now see thousands of patients from other states with near bans on abortion, most notably Missouri, Oklahoma and Texas.
Last fall, District Judge K. Christopher Jayaram blocked enforcement of requirements that include rules spelling out what providers must tell their patients, and a longstanding requirement that patients wait 24 hours after consulting a provider to undergo a procedure. On July 1, he allowed the providers to add a challenge to the new reporting law to their existing lawsuit rather than making them file a separate case.
The new law was supposed to take effect July 1 and would require providers to ask patients questions from a state script about their reasons for an abortion, although patients wouldn’t be forced to answer. Potential reasons include not being able to afford a child, not wanting a disabled child, not wanting to put schooling or a career on hold, and having an abusive spouse or partner. Clinics would be required to send data about patients’ answers to the state health department for a public report every six months.
“We are relieved that this intrusive law will not take effect,” the Center for Reproductive Rights, the national organization for abortion provider Planned Parenthood and the regional Planned Parenthood affiliate said in a joint statement. “This law would have forced abortion providers to collect deeply personal information — an unjustifiable invasion of patient privacy that has nothing to do with people’s health.”
Kansas already collects data about each abortion, such as the method and the week of pregnancy, but abortion opponents argue that having more information will aid in setting policies for helping pregnant women and new mothers. The Republican-controlled Legislature enacted the law over a veto from Democratic Gov. Laura Kelly.
At least eight other states have such reporting requirements, but the Kansas Supreme Court declared in 2019 that the state constitution protects access to abortion as a part of a “fundamental” right to bodily autonomy. In August 2022, Kansas voters decisively rejected a proposed amendment to say that the constitution doesn’t grant any right to abortion access.
The trial of the providers’ lawsuit had been set for late February 2025 before Jayaram delayed it in responded to the parties’ deal.
“The state is prepared to accept an agreement not to enforce the new law until the final judgment, provided that we get a schedule that accommodates the record that we think we need to develop in this case,” said Lincoln Wilson, a senior counsel for the anti-abortion Alliance Defending Freedom, which is leading the state’s defense of its laws.
Abortion providers suggested July 1 that the state wouldn’t enforce the new reporting requirement while the lawsuit proceeded, but the health department did not confirm that when reporters asked about it.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- South Korea's acting president moves to reassure allies, calm markets after Yoon impeachment
- CBS News Philadelphia's Aziza Shuler shares her alopecia journey: So much fear and anxiety about revealing this secret
- It’s not your imagination. High school seniors are more over the top than ever before.
- A Kansas woman died in an apartment fire. Her family blames the 911 dispatch center’s mistakes
- North Carolina trustees approve Bill Belichick’s deal ahead of introductory news conference
- Florida Republican Party chair Christian Ziegler accused of rape
- How Glee’s Kevin McHale and Jenna Ushkowitz’s New Project Will Honor Naya Rivera’s Voice
- Philadelphia votes to ban ski masks to decrease crime. Opponents worry it’ll unfairly target some
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- Scarlett Johansson and Colin Jost Step Out for Marvelous Red Carpet Date Night
Ranking
- Toyota to invest $922 million to build a new paint facility at its Kentucky complex
- Dow jumps 520 points as investors cheer inflation slowdown
- Madagascar’s top court ratifies president’s reelection in vote boycotted by opposition
- Mexico’s minimum wage will rise by 20% next year, to about $14.25 per day
- What were Tom Selleck's juicy final 'Blue Bloods' words in Reagan family
- Putin orders the Russian military to add 170,000 troops for a total of 1.32 million
- New York could see more legal pot shops after state settles cases that halted market
- Female athletes sue the University of Oregon alleging Title IX violations by the school
Recommendation
Could Bill Belichick, Robert Kraft reunite? Maybe in Pro Football Hall of Fame's 2026 class
GOP businessman Sandy Pensler joins crowded field of Senate candidates in Michigan
Wolverines Are Finally Listed as Threatened. Decades of Reversals May Have Caused the Protections to Come Too Late
This week on Sunday Morning (December 3)
McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
Guatemalan electoral magistrates leave the country hours after losing immunity from prosecution
At COP28, the Role of Food Systems in the Climate Crisis Will Get More Attention Than Ever
Watch this deer, who is literally on thin ice, get help from local firefighters