Current:Home > FinanceIs $4.3 million the new retirement number? -ForexStream
Is $4.3 million the new retirement number?
View
Date:2025-04-16 23:16:56
One of the toughest things about saving for retirement is that it's hard to estimate how much money you'll actually need to cover your senior living costs in full. After all, there are so many factors that will go into that equation, including your retirement age, the state of your health, your desired lifestyle, and inflation, to name only some.
In fact, you'll often hear that it's wise to aim for $1 million in savings because that sum is more likely to be enough to cover your costs throughout your senior years. Or is it?
The reality is that $1 million is an easy, clean number to land on. But for many retirees, it might fall short.
In fact, in a recent New York Life survey, today's workers said it would take an average of $4,342,378.86 in savings to be able to retire comfortably. But given where savers are at today, that sort of balance may be unrealistic.
Do you really need $4.3 million in retirement?
While Americans might think it will take around $4.3 million to retire without financial worries, their current 401(k) and IRA balances tell a much different story. That's because the average saver today only has $135,161.50 socked away.
Granted, it may be possible to grow $135,000 and change into roughly $4.3 million. Let's say you're 31 years old with $135,000 in savings and you want to retire at 67, which is full retirement age for Social Security purposes. If you were to stock away $1,000 a month between now and then at an average annual 8% return, which is a bit below the stock market's average, then you'd get to $4.4 million in time for retirement.
But a lot of people can't part with $12,000 a year for retirement savings purposes. And also, a lot of people who have $135,000 and change in savings are much older than their early 30s. So for a lot of people, getting to the $4.3 million mark isn't so doable.
Of course, it's important to ask the question of whether $4.3 million is really the right number to be aiming for. And the answer is that for some people, it might be.
But again, there's no single retirement savings target that guarantees you financial security throughout your senior years. So rather than fixate on a number that a survey arrives at, a better bet is to do your own number-crunching and planning to come up with a savings goal that's likely to allow you to meet your personal needs.
Remember, someone who wants to spend retirement gardening and spending time with family might need a lot less money than someone intending to retire in a large city and enjoy nightlife all the time. So while it may not be a bad idea for you to aim for $4.3 million in savings, you also shouldn't feel compelled to.
And do keep in mind that while $4.3 million is clearly a lot of money, even that sum doesn't guarantee that you won't run out. If you aren't careful, it's possible to spend down a nest egg of any size too quickly. So no matter what savings number you land on, you should not only work your hardest to attain it, but also, manage your money strategically once retirement does roll around.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Offer from the Motley Fool:The $21,756 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $21,756 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
veryGood! (7872)
Related
- Spooky or not? Some Choa Chu Kang residents say community garden resembles cemetery
- Fact Check: Did Kamala Harris Sue Exxon Over Climate Change?
- How the Trump Administration’s Climate Denial Left Its Mark on The Arctic Council
- Fox News agrees to pay $12 million to settle lawsuits from former producer Abby Grossberg
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- Carbon capture technology: The future of clean energy or a costly and misguided distraction?
- Investors Pressure Oil Giants on Ocean Plastics Pollution
- Kim Cattrall Talked About Moving On Before Confirming She'll Appear on And Just Like That...
- Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
- A Kentucky Power Plant’s Demise Signals a Reckoning for Coal
Ranking
- The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
- Why Kim Cattrall Says Getting Botox and Fillers Isn't a Vanity Thing
- New York Assembly Approves Climate Bill That Would Cut Emissions to Zero
- The Ultimatum’s Xander Shares What’s Hard to Watch Back in Vanessa Relationship
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- U.S. Mayors Pressure Congress on Carbon Pricing, Climate Lawsuits and a Green New Deal
- Two Years Ago, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis Was Praised for Appointing Science and Resilience Officers. Now, Both Posts Are Vacant.
- Fourth of July flight delays, cancellations contributing to summer travel woes
Recommendation
'Most Whopper
Nuclear Power Proposal in Utah Reignites a Century-Old Water War
More Than 100 Cities Worldwide Now Powered Primarily by Renewable Energy
In Attacks on Environmental Advocates in Canada, a Disturbing Echo of Extremist Politics in the US
SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
Check Out the Most Surprising Celeb Transformations of the Week
Oil Giants See a Future in Offshore Wind Power. Their Suppliers Are Investing, Too.
Fearing Oil Spills, Tribe Sues to Get a Major Pipeline Removed from Its Land